Hello to everyone who responded to my post to Kim True. I had sent two more responses that did not get posted, I believe due to an email/subscription mixup. They are below. I continue to get emailed, off-list thank yous and encouragement for what I said, and I appreciate them immensely but REALLY wish someone would post to the listserv so it does not appear I am the only one in the library world with these thoughts. The only time a difference is ever made is when people are vocal and unafraid. I'd also like to say that just because training exists promoting the topics we've been discussing, it doesn't prove they are correct or that they should exist at all. We've seen a couple sources posted to support the topics. I am posting one that does not. It perfectly illustrates that there ARE two sides involved. We are not to be promoting this with other people's tax dollars. Nor would I be posting anything on a library social media page arguing against it. Offer books, documentaries, etc. from both perspectives for your patrons to decide for themselves. And continue to not discriminate when it comes to who has access. https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/critical-race-theory-fight/ Thank you, THIS will be the last of my comments on this specific post. Karyn Ruley Technology Associate Crawford County Library (1st response) Hello - First, I would like to thank everyone for their kind and civil responses. I know this is a delicate subject. That being said, I actually did receive several responses to my post - all of them positive, all of them private. Many unfortunately fear speaking out about this topic when they have a certain view. I wish more would find the courage. I'd like to clarify my use of the word neutral. As libraries, we are funded with taxpayer dollars and are therefore not to take public stances on political issues. This IS a political issue with opposing sides and statistics, some believing that white privilege is not a true concept, that our country is not systemically racist, that "decolonizing" our collections is wrong, etc. Posting about diversity and inclusivity (linked topics) DOES upset a good portion of the patronage whether you agree with the subject and feel it's your mission or not. We have to be mindful that we serve our individual communities and not our own causes with our library positions and other citizens' tax dollars. As long as we are following the ALA guidelines and asking ourselves the questions I mentioned, as well as creating collections that fit our communities and not our own ideals, we are on the right track. It is not our place to tell our patrons what to think or how to behave on the world scale, it is our job to provide them with materials that fit their needs and interests to let them make up their own minds. Karyn Ruley Technology Associate Crawford County Library (2nd response) Hello, again - I feel I need to clarify a couple more things and then I am no longer commenting on this particular post as I dont believe this is the place for continuous debate. I will remain a voice on the subject and any other if I feel I need to be, and hope the fear of cancellation doesnt keep others quiet. I want to say I didnt assume everyones patron demographics are majority white. I was originally speaking directly to the OP and took a look at her area. The stats I saw showed the population to be 94% white. I dont live there, that may not be the most accurate number, but it gave me an idea before I made any assumptions. The ALA Code of Ethics may not use the words be neutral but it does use the word unbiased and states that we should distinguish between our personal convictions and professional duties and not allow our personal beliefs to interfere with fair representation of the aims of our institutions or the provision of access to their information resources. This type of neutrality is not the neutrality Elie Wiesel spoke of. Our service is to be fair and impartial and Im sure the majority of the libraries on this listserv would already consider their service as such. But we are not to go looking for problems. If a group feels underrepresented or underserved, they do have some responsibility in bringing it to our attention and they are welcome to make suggestions. Removing certain items from your collection and adding others to represent everyone might just create a collection your community didnt really want or ask for. Please remember people are not defined by their skin color or ethnic backgrounds or sexual orientation. Our experiences may be different or the same for many reasons. Sometimes, there just isnt a problem. When we insist on highlighting what we believe to be underrepresented groups are we diversifying or dividing? Maybe the group identity you gave them wasnt a big part of their identity to begin with. The first question shouldnt be How can we welcome a wider swath of the population? it should be How can we better serve OUR community? Sincerely, Karyn Ruley Technology Associate Crawford County Library 201 Plum St. Grayling, MI 49738 Phone: 989-348-9214 Fax: 989-348-9294 ----------------------------------